Hantek DSO5072P vs Siglent SDS1104X-U
Head-to-head spec comparison to help you pick the right scope for your bench.
Hantek
$180
Siglent
$419
Spec-by-Spec Comparison
| Spec | Hantek DSO5072P | Siglent SDS1104X-U |
|---|---|---|
| Bandwidth | 70 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Sample Rate | 1 GSa/s | 1 GSa/s |
| Channels | 2 | 4 |
| Memory Depth | 40 Kpts | 14 Mpts |
| Display Size | 7" | 7" |
| Weight | 2 kg | 3.1 kg |
| Price | $180 | $419 |
| Rating | 6.0/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Protocol Decoder | No | Yes |
| Function Gen | No | No |
| WiFi | No | No |
| Battery | No | No |
| Buy on Amazon · $180 | Buy on Amazon · $419 |
Pros & Cons
Hantek DSO5072P
Pros
- Traditional benchtop form factor — looks and feels like a real scope
- 70MHz bandwidth handles most hobbyist signals without complaint
- Reasonable price point for a desk instrument under $200
- Simple, button-based interface is easy to learn
Cons
- Only 2 channels limits simultaneous signal debugging
- 40Kpt memory depth is embarrassingly shallow by modern standards
- No protocol decoding — SPI and I2C debugging is impossible
- Fan can be noisy enough to notice in a quiet room
- No software update path to improve functionality
Siglent SDS1104X-U
Pros
- 4 channels with 100MHz bandwidth — best of both in Siglent's lineup
- CAN and LIN decoding included — no license fees unlike Rigol
- 14Mpt memory depth for long capture sessions
- Better probe compensation and input specs than older Siglent models
- Siglent's firmware has matured significantly with recent updates
Cons
- ~$419 for a 100MHz, non-touchscreen scope is a stiff ask
- No touchscreen — button navigation only
- 1GSa/s sample rate is adequate but not exceptional
- Rigol DHO924S offers 250MHz and a touchscreen for $30 more
Our Verdicts
Hantek DSO5072P
The Hantek DSO5072P is a budget benchtop scope that does the basics well and little else. At ~$180, you get a proper desk instrument with 70MHz bandwidth and a 7-inch display — the kind of setup that looks like a real oscilloscope rather than a tablet toy. It handles Arduino debugging and basic analog work just fine. The problem is the 40Kpt memory depth, which is almost unusably shallow compared to modern budget alternatives. If you need to capture long waveforms or decode SPI/I2C, look at the Rigol DS1054Z instead. The DS1054Z costs about $170 more but gives you 300x the memory, 4 channels, and protocol decoding — it's a completely different class of instrument.
Siglent SDS1104X-U
The Siglent SDS1104X-U is Siglent's answer to the 4-channel mid-range market, and its CAN/LIN decoding is its killer differentiator. Rigol charges extra for CAN decoding on most models; Siglent includes it free. If you're doing automotive embedded work — car CAN bus debugging, LIN network analysis, anything that touches vehicle electronics — the SDS1104X-U at $419 is the most cost-effective path to proper protocol support. For general hobbyist use without automotive protocol requirements, the DS1054Z at $349 remains better value, and the Rigol DHO924S at $449 offers 250MHz bandwidth and a touchscreen for just $30 more. I'd buy the SDS1104X-U specifically if CAN/LIN decoding is non-negotiable.