Hantek 6022BE vs Siglent SDS1202X-E
Head-to-head spec comparison to help you pick the right scope for your bench.
Hantek
$65
Siglent
$379
Spec-by-Spec Comparison
| Spec | Hantek 6022BE | Siglent SDS1202X-E |
|---|---|---|
| Bandwidth | 20 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Sample Rate | 0.048 GSa/s | 1 GSa/s |
| Channels | 2 | 2 |
| Memory Depth | 1 Mpts | 14 Mpts |
| Display Size | N/A | 7" |
| Weight | 0.2 kg | 3.3 kg |
| Price | $65 | $379 |
| Rating | 4.5/10 | 7.5/10 |
| Protocol Decoder | No | Yes |
| Function Gen | No | No |
| WiFi | No | No |
| Battery | No | No |
| Buy on Amazon · $65 | Buy on Amazon · $379 |
Pros & Cons
Hantek 6022BE
Pros
- Cheapest USB oscilloscope that actually works
- Tiny and portable — fits in a laptop bag or jacket pocket
- Works with open-source OpenHantek software (much better than official drivers)
- Bus-powered via USB — no wall adapter needed
- 1Mpt memory depth is genuinely decent for this price
Cons
- Only 20MHz bandwidth — severely limiting for most real work
- 48MSa/s sample rate means aliasing starts well below 20MHz
- Requires a PC to operate — useless in the field without a laptop
- Bundled software is mediocre; use OpenHantek instead
- No protocol decoding of any kind
Siglent SDS1202X-E
Pros
- 200MHz bandwidth — 4x the stock DS1054Z at nearly the same price
- 14Mpt memory depth is excellent for capturing long waveforms
- Protocol decoding includes CAN and LIN — Rigol charges extra for these
- SPL (Siglent Programming Language) for scripting and automation
- Serial decode is free, not locked behind a paid license
Cons
- Only 2 channels — the fundamental tradeoff versus the DS1054Z
- Interface is less intuitive than Rigol's — steeper learning curve
- Smaller community means fewer tutorials and answered questions online
- No touchscreen — button-heavy navigation
- No function generator
Our Verdicts
Hantek 6022BE
The Hantek 6022BE is the bare minimum USB oscilloscope — and I mean that literally, not as a compliment. At ~$65, you get 2 channels and 20MHz of bandwidth piped through your laptop screen, which is enough to verify that a PWM signal exists or check audio frequencies. The 20MHz limit is genuinely painful: you can't reliably see rise times on 3.3V Arduino signals, and anything SPI-related at normal speeds is already at the edge of what this scope can resolve. Skip the official software and use OpenHantek instead — it's actively maintained and much better. If you can stretch to the Analog Discovery 3, the difference is night and day. If you're truly at a $65 ceiling and just need to verify signals exist, this will do — but you'll outgrow it fast.
Siglent SDS1202X-E
The Siglent SDS1202X-E is the DS1054Z's biggest competitor, and it wins on raw specs: 200MHz bandwidth, 14Mpt memory, and protocol decoding that includes CAN and LIN without paying for licenses. The catch is you only get 2 channels, and that trade-off matters more than it sounds. When you're debugging SPI with clock, data, and chip-select lines all running, or trying to correlate an analog signal with a digital trigger, you'll wish you had 4 channels. If you work primarily with audio circuits, RF signals, or single-channel measurements, the 200MHz bandwidth is genuinely useful and this scope makes complete sense. For general embedded debugging with multiple signals, I'd take the DS1054Z's 4 channels over the extra bandwidth.